SEPTEMBER 4 & 11, 2022
FINAL WARNINGS AND EXHORTATIONS (PART I)
INTRODUCTION:
1. Having very clearly and thoroughly defended his authority as an Apostle of Jesus Christ, Paul now announces his purpose to exercise his apostolic power in the punishment of offenders.
2. As they sought evidence of his apostleship, he would show that, although weak in himself, he was invested with supernatural power by Christ.
3. Instead of exposing themselves to this exercise of Judicial authority, he exhorts them to try themselves beforehand. This would be the wise thing to do, for they might through an honest assessment come to repentance and be spared judgment.
4. In all, Paul was seeking their good. Whether he should come to them in love and in the spirit of meekness, or with the rod, his motive was the same, though he much preferred the former manner to the latter.
5. The object of this warning was to avoid the necessity of exercising the power of judgment with which Christ had invested him.
I. PAUL SERVES NOTICE THAT CONCERNING THE AUTHORITY WHICH THEY WERE CALLING INTO QUESTION, HE WAS READY TO EXERCISE BY WAY OF JUDGMENT. (VERSES 1-4)
A. HE ANNOUNCES HIS PLANS TO COME A THIRD TIME TO CORINTH,
1. Clearly, he had been to Corinth twice already, although the second trip is not anywhere specifically recorded. The Acts do not contain a full record of all of his travels, or all things that he did, thus we need not seek unnatural explanations of this text.
2. He gives notice of his plans in order that those offenders whom he has blamed might be more afraid to continue in their evil activities.
B. HIS DETERMINATION WAS TO ADHERE STRICTLY TO THE RULE OF SCRIPTURE IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF DISCIPLINE. (VERSE 1b; NUM. 35:30; DEUT. 17:6, etc.)
1. Paul is not saying, as some suggest, that his three visits would count as three witnesses, and thus he merely alludes to the prescription of the Law.
2. This principle of justice was transferred by our Lord to the new dispensation. (Matt. 18:16; John 8:17;
Heb. 10:28)
3. Three visits are not the testimony of three witnesses, by which he says every word, every accusation shall be established, i.e. legally and conclusively proved.
C. HE GIVES NOW THE SAME WARNING WHICH HE HAD GIVEN BEFORE (VERSE 2)
1. There are various views as to the proper construction of this verse. Some understand Paul to be saying, “I foretold you, and I foretell you as though present…” Others see him as saying, “I foretold you, and now foretell you the second time, as if present…” (Comp. Gal. 5:21)
2. Paul had foreborne long enough, and is now determined to apply discipline to “those who heretofore have sinned;” those who already stand in the category of known sinners, and “to all others,” that is, those who were not thus known.
3. In his coming, he would not spare these offenders, but would exercise the right of excommunication, which authority he possessed as an individual.
D. SINCE THEY SOUGHT PROOF OF CHRIST SPEAKING THROUGH HIM, LET THIS SPEAKING SUFFICE. (VERSE 3)
1. This is part of the sentence begun in Verse 2. “If I come I will not spare: since ye seek proof of Christ speaking in me.”
2. Since they sought proof of whether Christ was in him, they had better prove their own selves, whether Christ was in them (Verse 5); for if Christ was in them, they would recognize the power of Christ in Paul.
3. Since the evidence which he had already given in word and deed had not satisfied them, he was about to give them a proof which they would find it difficult to resist.
4. Note, the messenger of Christ, however weak in himself, was not to be despised, since Christ Who was in him was not weak, but powerful. His mighty power had been proven among them by countless manifestations, and that, through the weakness of His servant.
5. Paul had been assured that Christ’s power is made perfect in weakness. (Ch. 12:9)
E. THE GREATEST DEMONSTRATION OF CHRIST’S POWER IN WEAKNESS IS SEEN IN HIS OWN RESURRECTION. (VERSE 4)
1. As Christ appeared as weak in dying, but was nonetheless imbued with divine power, as was proved by His resurrection from the dead; so the Apostle in one sense was weak, in another, full of power.
2. Christ’s death was the evidence of weakness in the sense of having a weak or mortal nature, yet He liveth by the power of God.
a) The resurrection of Christ is sometimes referred to God the Father. (Rom. 6:4; Eph. 1:20; Phil. 2:9)
b) Sometimes it is attributed to Christ Himself. (Matt. 26:6; Mark 14:58; John 2:19; 10:18)
3. As Christ’s weakness was voluntary, as there rested in the suffering Lamb of God the resources of almighty power; so in the meek, forbearing apostle was a plentiful supply of supernatural power, which he had received from his ascended Lord.
4. Again, if due to his apparent weakness, they had come to doubt Paul’s power and authority, he, by his coming, was perfectly capable of removing such doubts, by the exercise of judicial authority which he derived from the risen, ascended Christ.
F. HE EXHORTS THEM, IN LIGHT OF HIS JUDICIAL AUTHORITY, TO EXAMINE THEMSELVES AS TO THEIR SPIRITUAL STANDING. (VERSE 5)
1. Those who oppose God’s ministers in the way of duty have reason to examine their own Christianity, whether it is true or false.
2. In one sense, if they were in the faith, that in itself would be a proof of his calling, for by him they heard the Gospel.
3. To examine and to prove mean the same thing. Both express the idea of trying to ascertain the nature and character of a person by examining the evidence.
4. The verdict to be determined is a vital one. “Whether ye be in the faith.” That is, they were to decide whether they really had faith, or were Christians in name only. Notice what this exhortation to self- examination supposes:
a) True faith is self-manifesting, that it reveals itself by its fruits.
b) Genuine faith may exist and yet the believer himself has doubts. Only what is doubtful needs to be determined by examination.
c) Just as it is possible to have true faith and yet lack assurance, it is also possible to have unfounded confidence of being in the faith.
d) Self-examination is highly recommended for every soul that professes faith in Christ. True faith has nothing to fear from honest biblical testing.
5. Again, the knowledge of whether Christ was in them would determine if they were approved or disapproved of God. “Know ye to that Christ is in you except ye be reprobates,” i.e. except ye be disapproved, worthy of approbation. Without this knowledge we have no hope of glory. (Col. 1:27)
G. IF THEY SHOULD PROVE TO BE WITHOUT EVIDENCE, HE WAS SATISFIED THAT THEY WOULD NOT FIND THAT HE WAS WITHOUT EVIDENCE. (VERSE 6)
1. Paul had said that the Corinthians had sought evidence (dokimane) that Christ was in him as an Apostle. (Verse 3) He then exhorted them to seek evidence that Christ was in them as believers. Should they prove to be without evidence (adokimane) he was certain that evidence was not lacking with respect to his apostleship.
2. Paul desired that they might all know that he was not reprobate, i.e. that he and his ministry were not disapproved by God, but rather approved of God. It is a practical knowledge that he wished them to have.
a) That they might receive his word as true, to the saving of their souls.
b) That they should know when they stand in the Judgment that their confidence had been well placed.
NOTE: We will deal with the remaining verses under these two main headings in our next lesson outline:
II. PAUL PRAYS THAT THEY MAY NOT GIVE OCCASION FOR HIM TO GIVE EVIDENCE OF HIS JUDICIAL AUTHORITY. (VERSES 7-10)
III. PAUL’S CONCLUDING EXHORTATION AND BENEDICTION. (VERSES 11-14)